[00:00:01]
SO[ CITY OF BAYTOWN NOTICE OF MEETING BAYTOWN FINANCE COMMITTEE THURSDAY, JUNE 4, 2026 3:30 P.M. BAYTOWN CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL 2401 MARKET STREET, BAYTOWN, TEXAS 77520 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCEMENT OF QUORUM ]
IT IS THREE 40.UM, UH, CALL THIS MEETING TO QUORUM OF THE BAYTOWN FINANCE COMMITTEE THURSDAY, JUNE 4TH, 2026.
THE BAYTOWN CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL 24 0 1 MARCUS STREET, BAYTOWN, TEXAS 7 7 5 2 0.
UM, SO WE'LL OPEN UP WITH CITIZENS COMMENT.
I IMAGINE WE DON'T HAVE ANY 'CAUSE THERE ARE NO OTHERS.
[a. Discuss the Proposed Project Funding Allocations.]
MOVE OVER, UM, TO ITEM TWO A, WHICH IS DISCUSSED OR PROPOSED PROJECT FUNDING ALLEGATIONS.GOOD AFTERNOON COMMITTEE MEMBERS, UH,
UH, IN FRONT OF YOU TODAY IS OUR PROPOSED CIP PLAN, A DRAFT DATED, UH, MAY 14TH, 2026.
THIS IS A PLAN THAT WAS PRESENTED TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT, UH, COMMITTEE MEMBERS, UH, AND IT WAS PRESENTED TO THEM PRIOR TO, UM, THE CHANGE BETWEEN THE COMMITTEES.
UM, AND SO, UH, I IMAGINE MR. FRANCO ISN'T HERE AND I CANNOT SPEAK ON HIM, BUT, UH, HE WAS FAMILIAR WITH THIS, THIS PRESENTATION PRIOR.
SO WE'LL GO OVER, UH, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND REVIEW AND DISCUSS SOME OF THE ALLOCATIONS THAT WE'RE PROPOSING.
UH, HOPEFULLY BY THE END OF THIS PRESENTATION, I BE NECESSARILY TO ANSWER ANY PROJECT DETAILS, ANY QUESTIONS Y'ALL MIGHT HAVE ON THE REALLOCATION AND OUR GOALS, UM, FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS.
UH, SO THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE'VE PROBABLY SAID MULTIPLE TIMES, BUT, UH, THE GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS WE'RE ACTUALLY, WE, WE'VE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO SELL THOSE, IF THAT'S CORRECT, OR THE, THE, SORRY, THE CERTIFICATE OF OBLIGATION BONDS THAT WE'RE AUTHORIZED TO SELL.
AND WE'RE GETTING FUNDED FOR THE GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND AS WELL.
UH, THESE PROJECTS WERE IDENTIFIED IN FY 26, BUT THESE WILL NOT START UNTIL FY 27 BECAUSE OF THE BOND TIMING AND HOW FUNDING WORKS.
UH, BUT IT'S ANNUAL RENEWAL OF ASPHALT STREETS, $20 MILLION NORTH ALEXANDER TRAFFIC SIGNAL, $7.49 MILLION, JENKINS PARK, $451,000, FIRE STATION NUMBER FOUR, $4.25 MILLION AND SIDEWALK AND PEDESTRIAN CROSSING A DA IMPROVEMENTS $2.5 MILLION.
IT IS, UH, I, I'LL MENTION IT HERE AND WE WILL PROBABLY HEAR ABOUT IT AT COUNCIL AS WELL.
UM, BUT WE DID APPLY FOR SOME PRECINCT TWO GRANTS, AND WE DID GET WORD BACK.
WE WERE SELECTED FOR THE JENKINS PARK PROJECT, BUT WE WERE NOT SELECTED FOR THE FIRE STATION FOR SIDEWALK AND PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, NOR THE, UH, ANNUAL RENEWAL OF ASPHALT STREETS AND ADDITIONAL GRANT FUNDS.
UM, SORRY, I'M GONNA ASK THE SAME THING.
HOW MUCH WAS IT THAT WE ENDED UP GETTING FROM PRECINCT TWO FOR JENKINS? FOR JENKINS, IT'S GOING TO BE EIGHT.
YES, IF SOMEBODY CAN PULL THAT UP, UH, AND GIVE IT TO YOU BEFORE THE END OF THE PRESENTATION, I'D APPRECIATE IT.
UM, AND THAT'S, I WAS GONNA FOLLOW UP WITH US RECEIVING THOSE.
WILL THAT, UM, IMPACT THIS BUDGET ALLOCATION? IT, IT WILL NOT CHANGE IT SINCE THIS IS GEO BOND.
UM, I THINK WHENEVER WE SUBMITTED THE GRANT, THIS WAS PART OF THE MATCH AND SO WE'RE STILL REQUIRED TO HAVE THESE FUNDS AVAILABLE TO EXECUTE THE PROJECT.
1.2 REQUESTED 1.2 50 CITY FUNDS.
SO, SO THE 450 WAS OUR CITY MATCHED.
AND SO THE GRANT WAS 1.2, 1.2 MILLION, UM, OR JENKINS? YES, MA'AM.
BUT, AND, AND THAT'S WHAT I WAS WONDERING.
SINCE THE ASPHALT STREETS ARE NOT COVERED, THOSE ARE IN THE GEO BOND OR THEY'RE NOT, THESE ARE STILL IN THE GEO BOND.
SO THE 20 MILLION, WE WERE TRYING TO UTILIZE OUR GEO BOND FUNDS TO, UH, LEVERAGE MORE GRANT FUNDS TO SEE IF WE COULD DO MORE STREETS AND ADDRESS MORE ISSUES IN THE CITY, BUT OH, OKAY.
UM, IT, IT DID NOT GET SELECTED AND I DID NOT HEAR THAT WE WERE RUNNERS UP EITHER.
SO, AND THEN FOR JENKINS PARK, IS THIS JUST THE, WHAT WAS APPROVED ON THE GEO BOND, WHICH IS JUST THE, THE STUDY COSTING? WELL, IT WAS JUST THE GEO WAS JUST TO DO THE STUDY.
SO THAT'S ALL THAT'S GETTING COVERED.
IT'S CORRECT, BUT THE, THE ACTUAL GRANT IS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION PORTION.
WELL, THAT'S WHAT I WAS WONDERING TO KNOW.
SO, SO WE NOW HAVE A GEO BOND TO COVER THE DESIGN OR THE, THE RESEARCH CALLED THAT.
AND THEN THE GRANT SHOULD COVER THE BUILDING.
I KNOW A COUPLE OF CITIZENS THAT'LL BE VERY EXCITED ABOUT THAT.
NO, I'M PLAYING, I'M PLAYING, I'M PLAYING.
SO, UH, CURRENT TIMELINE, UH, WE'RE, WE'RE IN THE MIDDLE OF THIS RIGHT NOW, SO MAY, 2026 WAS OUR CIP BUDGET ENTRY DEADLINE.
JUNE 20, 26, CIP COMMITTEE DISCUSSES THE PROPOSED CIP.
WE ARE MEETING WITH THEM LATER TO FIND, OR LATER, LATER THIS MONTH TO FINALIZE THE CIP.
UM, THERE WAS SOME CHANGES THAT THEY ASKED FOR, AND SO I'LL, I'LL PREFACE THAT WHEN WE GET TO THE ALLOCATIONS, THERE ARE SOME CHANGES THAT ARE GOING TO HAPPEN, BUT I'LL BE VERY VOCAL ABOUT WHAT THOSE CHANGES ARE.
UH, JULY, 2026 CITY COUNCIL RECEIVES
[00:05:01]
THE CITY'S PROPOSED BUDGET, UH, AUGUST, 2026.THE BUDGET WORK SESSIONS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS STARTS SIMILAR TO LAST YEAR.
AND THEN SEPTEMBER 22 6, CITY COUNCIL WILL CONSIDER THE PROPOSED BUDGET FOR AN ADOPTION.
UH, SO FUTURE AND ONGOING IN PROGRESS, WE ADDED A LIST ON HERE.
AND SO YOU'LL SEE, UH, A REFERENCE TO THE ONGOING PROJECTS WITHIN THIS PRESENTATION.
UH, WE'RE STILL TRYING TO REFINE WHAT MECHANISMS WE USE TO DELIVER THIS INFORMATION ONCE IT'S BEYOND THE FIVE YEAR CIP OR WE ARE BEYOND THAT FISCAL YEAR THAT STARTS THE CIP, YOU DON'T REALLY HEAR ABOUT THESE PROJECTS.
AND SO CIP HAS REQUESTED THAT WE SHOW TRANSPARENCY AND FIGURE OUT A WAY TO SHOW THAT THERE'S STILL THINGS GOING ON WITH THESE PROJECTS.
THEY'RE JUST NOT IN THE CIP, YOU'RE ACTUALLY NOT GONNA SEE THAT IN THIS RIGHT HERE, BUT IT'S JUST SOMETHING THAT INTERNALLY WE'RE WORKING ON HAVING AVAILABLE ON REQUEST.
AND THEN WE'LL SHOW THE APPROVED OR THE, THE PROPOSED PROJECT LIST THAT WE'VE IDENTIFIED THAT, UM, SOURCES OR FUNDING SOURCES OR PROGRESS HAS BEEN MADE WITHOUT FUNDING OR PROGRESS MADE.
UH, WE'VE IDENTIFIED IN THE CIP AND THERE'S ALSO PROPOSED PROJECT LISTS THAT DON'T HAVE A FUNDING SOURCE IDENTIFIED THEM.
I'VE GOT A INTERNAL THAT THAT'S A, IT'S LIKE UNFUNDED PROJECTS, PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED, BUT WE DON'T KNOW HOW WE'RE GONNA FUND THEM.
SO THEY'RE, UH, THAT WAS A LOT OF WORKMED OR PUSHED BACK OR, BUT WE DON'T WANNA REMOVE THEM FROM THE CIP IN THE EVENT THAT THEY BECOME A PRIORITY LATER AND WE CAN PRIORITIZE FUNDING, WE WILL CHANGE THAT SENTENCE TO MAKE IT CLEAR.
SO ANNUAL RELOCATION OF AVAILABLE CIP FUNDING.
UM, SO THE GOAL IS TO DO THIS ON AN ANNUAL BASIS.
UH, AND THE INTENTION IS TO AVOID MULTIPLE MID-YEAR REALLOCATIONS AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
THAT'S TRANSFERRING BETWEEN PROJECT TO PROJECT, UH, TRANSFERRING BETWEEN FUNDS.
UH, SO BOND FUNDS MUST BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE IDENTIFIED ON THE ISSUANCE, AND THAT'S JUST MORE REASSURANCE THAT WE'RE NOT TRANSFERRING MONEY FROM ONE PROJECT TO A UNRELATED AND, UM, NOT APPLICABLE PROJECT.
AND ANYTIME THAT WE BRING THIS UP, WE WANT IT FORMALIZED AND, AND PRESENT IT TO Y'ALL SO THAT Y'ALL SEE AND APPROVE THIS AS THE POLITICAL BODY IN CHARGE.
UM, FOR THAT, THAT FIRST THING INTENDED TO AVOID MULTIPLE MID-YEAR REALLOCATION OTHER THAN JUST HAVING TO CHANGE WHAT WE'RE DOING.
WHAT IS THE OTHER POSITIVE OF THAT? BECAUSE FOR ME, IF, IF WE HAVE A SET OF FUNDS AND, AND THE CITY STAFF WITH COUNCIL SEES THAT IT COULD BE USED IN A BETTER OR MORE EFFICIENT WAY, WHY DID THAT BECOME A GOAL? SO, UH, THE INTENTION WAS TO TRY AND REDUCE, UM, FUNDING BEING MOVED, AND THEN JUST THE, THE CONFUSION AMONG, THERE'S FUNDING AVAILABLE HERE, THERE'S FUNDING AVAILABLE THERE, EVEN IF THE INTENTIONS OF OF, OF STAFF WERE GOOD AND, AND WE WERE TRYING TO DO WHAT'S BEST FOR THE CITY.
UM, IT CREATED A LOT OF CONFUSION BECAUSE OKAY.
A LOT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RIGHT TRAILS TOO THAT JUST DON'T REALLY ALIGN WITH, YOU KNOW, FINANCES, INTERNAL CONTROLS.
AND IT'S HARD FOR PUBLIC WORK STAFF AS WELL TO TRACK.
CASH FUNDS, SO THESE MUST BE IN ACCORDANCE OR USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ALLOWABLE USES BY THAT FUND.
IE IF THERE IS A WATER AND SEWER, UH, FUND OR CASH FUNDS, THEY CAN ONLY BE USED FOR WATER AND SEWER.
UH, SO IT'LL FOLLOW A SIMILAR PROCESSES OF BONDS.
SO, UH, A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT REASONS THESE FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE.
UM, SO THERE'S PROJECT SAVINGS WHEN WE HAVE DEDUCTIVE CHANGE ORDERS OR WE HAVE A BALANCING CHANGE ORDER THAT'S PRESENTED TO THE POLITICAL BODY AND IT'S A REDUCTION OR A CREDIT, UM, THOSE PROJECT SAVINGS STAY LOCKED TO THAT BOND OR THAT, THAT, THAT CASH ACCOUNT UNTIL WE CAN REALLOCATE IT.
AND SO WE'RE TRYING TO FORMALIZE THAT WITH THIS PROCESS SO THAT IT DOESN'T JUST SIT IN A, IN AN ACCOUNT AND THEN YOU REVIEW IT A YEAR LATER.
UM, THE INTEREST EARN ON THE BOND PROCEEDS OVER TIME AS WE UTILIZE BOND FUNDS.
AND, UM, WE ENCUMBER THESE FUNDS.
SOME OF THEM SIT IN AN ACCOUNT FOR A LITTLE BIT, UH, WHILE WE WAIT, AND THEY EARN INTEREST ON THAT OUTSIDE OF ARBITRAGE REQUIREMENTS THAT WE, WE'D LIKE TO REALLOCATE THOSE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
UH, AND THEN PROJECT SCOPE CHANGES.
SOMETIMES WE PROCEED WITH THE NOTION THAT WE'RE GOING TO REPAIR 60 THINGS AND IT TURNS OUT THAT WE ONLY NEED TO REPAIR 50 THINGS.
AND SO THOSE 10 THINGS THAT WE SAVE MONEY ON, THAT THAT MONEY HAS TO GO SOMEWHERE.
AND PROJECT FUNDING CHANGES, FOR EXAMPLE, UM, WE'LL, WE'LL, WE'LL USE ONE MARKET STREET.
UH, WE APPLIED FOR A GRANT, WE WERE AWARDED A GRANT, AND THAT FREED UP SOME OF THE ALLOCATION OR THE ALLOCATABLE FUNDS.
SO IN FRONT OF YOU NOW IS THE PROPOSED REALLOCATION OF THE CIP BOND AND CASH FUNDS.
ON THE LEFT SIDE, YOU'LL SEE THE BOND ISSUANCES THAT IT'S RELATING TO AND THE AVAILABLE CASH FUNDS FOR REALLOCATION.
UM, EACH ONE OF THOSE FUNDS IS DIFFERENT THINGS, SEWER FUND WATER AND SEWER BAWA.
UM, THERE IS, UM, FACILITIES AND, AND DRAINAGE,
[00:10:01]
UM, AND THEN TRANSPORTATION.SO YOU'LL SEE THAT THAT TOTALS TO $20,179,449.
AND ON THE CASH SIDE, UH, YOU'LL SEE THE FUNDING SOURCES FOR EACH OF THE CASH THAT'S AVAILABLE IS BAWA DRAINAGE FACILITIES, LIFT STATIONS, PARKS, AND, AND OTHER ITEMS. AND THAT TOTAL IS 9,253,581.
SO THE TOTAL ALLOTABLE FOR REALLOCATION IS 29,000,430 3030.
LET'S USE IT ALL FOR, UH, SSO
WELL, LUCKILY THERE'S SOME ON THIS LIST FOR YOU.
UM, SO PROPOSED REALLOCATION WATER AND SEWER FUNDS.
PROPOSED, UH, REALLOCATION OF CIP FUNDS FOR THE FY 27 PROJECTS.
UM, SO YOU'LL SEE ON HERE, THERE'S, THERE'S A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT PROJECTS LISTED.
AND SO THOSE THAT AREN'T REFLECTED IN THE FY 26 OR FY THE PROJECTS ABOVE ARE NOT REFLECTED IN THE FY 26 OR THE FY 27 THROUGH 31 CIP BECAUSE THESE TRANSFERS ARE GOING TO BE INITIATED, UH, AS SOON AS THE, YOU KNOW, COUNCIL APPROVES THESE REALLOCATION.
AND SO, UH, WE HAVE LANTERN PARK HERE FOR COMING OUT OF THE BOND FUNDS FOR $4.5 MILLION.
SO WE ACTUALLY RECEIVED A GRANT FOR ANOTHER $4.5 MILLION, UM, FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF LANTERN PARK ROADS, ALONG WITH, UM, THE REMAINING STREETS IN BAY OAKS HARBOR, WHICH IS DOLPHIN HARBOR AND CAMPUS BACK BAY MOSQUITO CONTROLLED BUILDING.
THIS IS BEING TRANSFERRED OVER FROM ACTUALLY ANOTHER PROJECT, OR WE'RE PROPOSING THE TRANSFER FROM ANOTHER PROJECT, MOSQUITO CONTROL AND THE DFE HEALTH BUILDING WERE DONE TOGETHER.
AND SO WE'RE JUST MOVING THE FUNDS FROM THE HEALTH BUILDING OVER TO MOSQUITO CONTROL SO THAT WE CAN GET STARTED ON THAT PORTION OF THE PROJECT.
I THOUGHT THERE WERE TALKS OF US NOT DOING ANYTHING WITH THAT BUILDING.
DO YOU, WHAT IS THE BACKSTORY AND WHY WE DECIDED TO, SO, OR ORIGINALLY, WHENEVER WE WERE DESIGNING MOSQUITO CONTROL, THE DESIGN CONTRACT WAS STARTING TO EXCEED WHAT WE ORIGINALLY PLANNED.
UH, WE DID A LITTLE BIT OF INTERNAL SHUFFLING AND DISCOVERED THAT WE COULD POSSIBLY DO IT IF WE DEVELOP A SHELL OF A BUILDING AND TRY TO DO AS MUCH OF THE WORK INTERNALLY.
UH, AND SO WE'RE PURSUING TWO SEPARATE CONTRACTS WITH A, WELL, THREE, THE FIRST CONTRACT WAS ALREADY, UH, AWARDED, UH, A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO AT COUNCIL, WHICH WAS THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PORTION OF IT, TO DESIGN THE SHELL, UH, DESIGN THE FOUNDATION TO SUPPORT THE PEB.
THE SECOND PORTION OF THAT PROJECT WAS THE CONSTRUCTION ITSELF.
WE HAVEN'T GOTTEN A BID JUST YET, BUT IT'S GONNA CONSTRUCT ITSELF THE PROJECT.
THE THIRD PORTION THAT WE'RE GONNA TRY AND LOOK AT IS WHETHER OR NOT WE CAN CONSTRUCT IT IN-HOUSE, OUR INTERNAL RENOVATION TEAM TO SEE IF WE COULD BUILD IT OUT OR IF WE NEED TO HIRE ANOTHER CONTRACTOR TO DO THE INTERNAL BUILD OUT.
THE GOAL WAS TO REDUCE THE COST AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, UM, AND SO KIND OF COM COMPARTMENTALIZING EACH OF THOSE STEPS ALLOWED US TO DO THAT.
AND THAT'S KIND OF WHERE THIS SITS.
AND THAT, THAT MONEY CAME FROM THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT, CORRECT? IT, IT'S, UH, IT COMES FROM THE, THE FACILITIES, UM, BOND ITSELF.
AND THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT ALREADY GOT WHAT IT NEEDED? YES.
THIS IS POST, SO THAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED HOW WE LIKE PROJECT SAVINGS.
SO WE HAVE THE WEST CEDAR BAYER LYNCHBURG PROPERTY ACQUISITION FOR SECONDARY BENEFITS, WHICH WAS, UH, PROPERTY ACQUISITION THAT'S GONNA BE NEEDED TO IMPROVE SERVICES IN THE AREA OUTSIDE OF WHAT WAS PRESENTED TO THE, THE CITIZENS OF BAYTOWN IN THE JEEP GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND.
THIS ISN'T, PER SE, THE SAME THING.
UH, WIDENING IS, UM, OUTSIDE OF THIS, THIS IS MORE FOR SECONDARY BENEFIT.
UM, AND THEN WE HAVE FOUR OTHER PROJECTS THAT ARE LISTED AND HIGHLIGHTED HERE.
UM, WHAT YOU'LL SEE IS THAT THE HIGHLIGHTED ONES ARE CENTRAL DISTRICT ON THIS ONE, AND YOU'LL SEE SSO THIS IS PART OF THE EARLY ACTION PLAN.
UM, AND SO THIS IS FOR THE DESIGN AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REQUIRED TO SUPPORT THAT DESIGN ENDEAVOR.
AND SO THERE'S SOME STAFF AUGMENTATION THAT'S GOING TO TAKE PLACE DURING THIS PROJECT.
THERE IS SEVERAL PROJECTS LISTED BELOW IT.
UM, THE FIRST ONE THAT YOU'LL SEE IS AN EARLY ACTION PLAN SSO PROJECT FOR JAMES STREET LIFT STATION THAT IS SLATED FOR FY 27.
YOU'LL SEE THE WATER METER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM, THE 1.1 MILLION.
UM, YEAH, WHICH IS PRETTY EXCITING.
I THINK, UH, IF I RECALL, THIS IS WHAT PUT A SMILE ON THERESA'S FACE.
SHE WAS ALL SMILES AT COUNCIL
UH, SO WE HAVE FIRE STATION FOUR REPLACEMENT.
UM, AND SO THIS IS ONE OF THE NUMBERS THAT MAY OR MAY NOT CHANGE.
WE DID APPLY FOR A GRANT AND WE WERE GONNA DO AN ALLOCATION OF $4 MILLION
[00:15:01]
FOR THAT GRANT MATCH.WE DID NOT GET SELECTED FOR THAT GRANT.
WE'LL NEED A DECISION, UM, INTERNALLY AND, UH, TO FORMALLY REQUEST Y'ALL'S APPROVAL ON WHETHER OR NOT WE WANTED TO PROCEED WITH AT LEAST PUTTING THAT FUNDING INTO THE CONSTRUCTION AT THIS TIME, UM, WHERE IT WOULD TECHNICALLY SIT UNTIL WE ACQUIRE THE REST OF THE FUNDING.
SO, UM, THAT MAY COME BACK AND I JUST WANTED TO BE TRANSPARENT ABOUT THAT.
IS THE CONSTRUCTION, SO ARE, IS IT GONNA BE IN THE SAME LOCATION? WE ARE IN TALKS WITH A NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, UM, ABOUT TWO BLOCKS OVER.
YEAH, BECAUSE WASN'T THAT PART OF THE BOND WAS THE LAND.
SO WE'RE ACTUALLY DESIGN AND ACQUISITION $11 MILLION FOR CONSTRUCTION FY 28.
THIS WAS JUST BE, YOU KNOW, A GRANT OPPORTUNITY CAME UP AND THIS WOULD'VE BEEN THE REQUIREMENT TO A MATCH THAT WE WOULD NOT HAVE HAD BECAUSE THE, THE LAND THAT'S NEARBY THAT WAS APPROVED.
AND THEN WE HAVE TWO OTHER THAT ARE PENDING.
AND, UM, WE'RE STILL WORKING ON IDENTIFYING WHERE THIS FUNDING IS GONNA COME FROM.
UH, BUT IT'S LIBRARY AND OUTDOOR IMPROVEMENTS.
UM, AND THEN IT IS THE CITY HALL IMPROVEMENTS, UM, THAT WERE PRESENTED TO THE CIP COMMITTEE, WHICH WERE, UH, CARPET REPLACEMENT CARPET.
THERE'S ALSO ON HERE A STUDY, UH, WHICH IS THE ALTERNATE WATER SOURCES.
UM, I DON'T KNOW WHAT SAYS REV MEANS, BUT ALTERNATE WATER SOURCES.
UH, ESSENTIALLY IT'S A STUDY TO EXPLORE THE POTENTIAL OF GROUNDWATER, UM, PRODUCTION OR, OR THE FEASIBILITY OF GROUNDWATER PRODUCTION AT OUR BAA EAST PLANT AND OUR BAA MAIN PLANT TO SEE IF WE CAN INCREASE CAPACITY, UM, AND ALSO TO DIVERSIFY OUR WATER SOURCES.
YES, I JUST TALKED TO JAY ABOUT THAT TODAY.
SO, AND, UH, BAAS WAS BROUGHT ON BOARD TO DISCUSS THIS AS WELL.
SO, UM, FY 27, THE NEW DRAINAGE PROJECT.
SO THIS IS WHERE YOU'RE GONNA SEE A CHANGE.
UH, THE LAST TIME WE PRESENTED THIS, AND THIS IS THE EXACT, UH, PRESENTATION, LAST TIME WE PRESENTED THIS TO CIP COMMITTEE, UH, THERE WAS A REQUEST TO SEE WHAT WE CAN DO TO FUND, UH, DAN OBINA AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
AND SO, UH, THIS NEW DRAINAGE PROJECT WILL BE REPLACED WITH DAN OBINA.
UM, AND WE'RE NOT ENTIRELY SURE OF THE FUNDS THAT WE'LL BE ABLE TO TRANSFER JUST YET.
UH, BUT WE'RE WORKING ON IDENTIFYING THOSE.
THEN WE HAVE THE ALLEN BROOK INTERIOR STREETS, WHICH IS A $1.2 MILLION CASH REALLOCATION, AND THEN TABS BAY MASTER PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATION.
THIS IS A STUDY AND TO FIGURE OUT WHAT CAN BE DONE WITH TABS BAIT, UH, THAT'S $338,599 CASH.
UH, AND THEN GOOSE CREEK PARK IMPROVEMENTS AT BECK, THIS IS 200,000 CASH.
I CAN'T RECALL EXACTLY WHAT THAT PROJECT IS, BUT THAT WAS DISCUSSED WITH PARKS AND REC.
SO WE'LL GET Y'ALL MORE DETAILS ON THAT.
AND THEN THE SECOND PORTION HERE FOR THE BYLAW ALTERNATE WATER SOURCES IS THE FIELD EXPLORATION PORTION.
UM, OUTSIDE OF THE STUDY, THERE'S GONNA NEED TO BE SOME SURVEYING AND SOME, SOME ACTUAL WORK THAT'S CONDUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND THAT'S FOR 300,000.
AND THEN THE FINAL, UM, PROJECT LISTED UP THERE IS THE EARLY ACTION PLAN HYDROLOGY MODEL THAT WE'RE WORKING ON.
WE DID OUR SMALL DIAMETER WATER LINES AND HYDROLOGY MODEL.
THIS IS FOR LARGE LINE INSPECTION AND
SO YOU'RE GONNA SEE SEVERAL SLIDES FROM HERE ON, UH, DISCUSSING THE DIFFERENT WAYS THAT THE REALLOCATION CAN BE VIEWED.
UM, AND SO ON THE SCREEN RIGHT NOW IS THE AVAILABLE BALANCES OF CIP FUNDS PROPOSED REALLOCATION OF THE AVAILABLE BALANCES.
AND SO YOU'LL SEE THAT THE BOW PROJECTS, THE AVAILABLE FOR REALLOCATION WAS $711,160.
THE PROPOSED AMOUNT, WHICH IS THE PROJECTS THAT WE PROPOSED HERE TO BE USED IS $711,160 WITH ZERO REMAINING.
THE DRAINAGE PROJECTS YOU'LL SEE UP THERE, THE AVAILABLE FOR REALLOCATION WAS $1.2 BILLION.
AND WE DIDN'T HAVE, AT THE TIME PROPOSED AMOUNT USED FOR IT WHILE WE WERE WAITING TO SEE HOW DENA, UM, THE PHASE TWO PORTION OF IT WAS GOING TO BE FUNDED.
UH, AND SO THAT REMAINING AMOUNT IS WHAT I WAS UH, MENTIONING.
THAT MAY CHANGE AND THAT REMAINING AMOUNT MAY BE PROPOSED AS USE FOR DANINA.
THE DRAINAGE WATER AND SEWER AND TRANSPORTATION BONDS THAT ARE LISTED ON HERE ARE $995,683.
AND WE ARE PROPOSING USE ALL OF THEM, THE FACILITIES IN TRANSPORTATION BONDS,
[00:20:01]
THERE'S $12,270,511 PROPOSED FOR REALLOCATION.THE PROPOSED AMOUNT THAT WE'RE GONNA USE IS 12,252,500.
WHAT'S GONNA HAPPEN WITH THE OTHER 10? WITH THE OTHER NINE
WELL, THE OTHER 10 OF WHAT THE PROPOSED REALLOCATION ON FACILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, THAT'S WHERE THAT NEGATIVE 18,000 WAS AT.
I'M TRYING TO REMEMBER EXACTLY.
AND THERESA, YOU MIGHT, SINCE WE'RE NOT EXPENDING ALL OF IT TO KNOW WHICH ONE, WHAT WE'RE DOING WITH $18,010.
OH, SO THAT IS BECAUSE IN THE 2017 CO THERE WAS LIKE, UM, THE ARBITRAGE PAYMENT OR SOMETHING TO WHERE, I DON'T REMEMBER, BUT IT HAD A NEGATIVE OF 17.
WE'RE JUST GONNA CORRECT THE BOND.
AND SO WE ARE GONNA REIMBURSE THAT ONE, WHICH WAS 18,000.
SO TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS AND THERE'S ANOTHER NEGATIVE OF 18,000 THAT THEY'RE REFERRING TO.
UM, YEAH, THAT BOND WAS A TRANSPORTATION BOND.
SO BECAUSE FACILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION HAS TRANSPORTATION LISTED, WE PROPOSED JUST FUNDING THE OTHER PORTION AND PUTTING US BACK TO ZERO.
SO THERE'S NO OTHER REALLOCATION PROPOSED FOR THAT TRANSPORTATION PROJECT.
AND SO PROJECTS, UH, WE PROPOSE USE OF THAT ENTIRE 5 MILLION.
UH, THE GENERAL FUND USES, UH, THERE'S 4 MILLION AVAILABLE FOR REALLOCATION AND WE PROPOSE THE AMOUNT OF 1,738,599, AND THEN THE AVAILABLE, UH, WAS 2.3 MILLION.
AND SO WE'RE STILL EXPLORING SOME ITEMS THAT WE'LL BRING TO THIS BODY, UM, FOR REALLOCATION.
UM, AND THEN WE'LL FORM FORMALIZE THAT REMAINING NUMBER TO HOPEFULLY BE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
AND IF THERE IS SOME REMAINING WE WE'LL BE TRANSPARENT ABOUT.
SO THIS IS JUST A GENERALIZED QUESTION.
UM, WHEN THERE'S MONEY THAT'S REMAINING AVAILABLE AND WE LEAVE IT THERE TO IDENTIFY OTHER PLACES, OTHER WAYS WE CAN USE IT.
WHY WITH THE 18,000? ARE WE NOT DOING THAT? IS IT JUST BECAUSE OF THE AMOUNT? WHY ARE, WHY IS THAT GONNA JUST GO BACK INTO THE SO WE, WE MOVED? YEAH, THAT'S MORE OF A, THERE CAN PROBABLY ADD SOME BETTER.
I'M JUST CURIOUS AS TO WHY THAT AMOUNT WAS CHOSEN JUST TO GIVE, NOT BE INCLUDED.
WELL, UH, THE REASON THE 18,000 IS THERE IS BECAUSE THAT BOND ACTUALLY WAS OVERSPENT IS WHAT SHE WAS TRYING TO SAY.
SO WE ARE TRYING TO CORRECT THE BOND BY GIVING THE BOND THAT MONEY BACK.
OH, BECAUSE SHE HAD OVERSPEND ON A BOND.
SO WE'RE JUST TRYING TO CORRECT THAT BOND AND PUT IT BACK TO HOLD.
THAT'S WHY WE CAN'T, THAT'S WHY WE CAN'T USE IT.
SO THEN THE BYLAW, WE HAVE $1.4 MILLION AND THEN THE PROPOSED AMOUNT USED WAS 300,000.
SO THE REMAINING AMOUNT WAS 1.1 MILLION.
AGAIN, SOME OF THESE NUMBERS MIGHT CHANGE, UH, WATER AND SWORD.
WE HAD 3.77 MILLION AND WE'RE PROPOSING 1.2 MILLION.
SO THE, AND THE AVAILABLE AMOUNT WAS 2.5 MILLION.
AND THEN BELOW YOU'LL SEE THAT THE SAME NUMBERS DEPICTED IN MANY DIFFERENT WAYS.
SO FUNDING SOURCE FOR BONDS, THE AVAILABLE FOR REALLOCATION, WHICH YOU SAW A COUPLE SLIDES AGO WAS 20 MILLION.
UM, AND THEN CASH WAS 9000009.2 MILLION.
SO WE'RE PROPOSING 18.9 MILLION TO USED ON BONDS AND THEN 3.2 MILLION OF CASH.
SO MOVING DOWN, YOU CAN SEE THE USE CATEGORIES FOR, UM, EACH OF THOSE.
SO THE GENERAL FUND IS 18,500,000, UH, AVAILABLE FOR REALLOCATION.
AND THE PROPOSED AMOUNT TO BE USED IS 14,986,000.
THE REMAINING AMOUNT IS 3.5 MILLION.
BYLAW IS 2.1 MILLION AVAILABLE FOR REALLOCATION.
WE'RE PROPOSING THE AMOUNT USED.
1 MILLION, THE REMAINING AMOUNT IS A 1 MILLION AND 113,000, UH, WATER AND SOAR, YOU'LL SEE 8.7 MILLION, ALMOST 8.8 MILLION.
UM, THE PROPOSED AMOUNT TO BE USED IS 6.2 MILLION WITH THE REMAINING AMOUNT BEING 2.5 MILLION.
AND SO THERE'S STILL 7.1 MILLION THAT, UM, IS AVAILABLE FOR REALLOCATION.
AGAIN, WE'RE WORKING ON FINALIZING THOSE ESTIMATES SO THAT WE CAN UPDATE YOU ON THE EXACT NUMBERS.
BUT, UM, WE'LL COME TO Y'ALL WITH, UH, THOSE NUMBERS.
UM, ONCE YOU GET THAT, THANK YOU.
SO WE'RE GONNA SEE A BUNCH OF CHARTS THAT LINE OUT THE EXACT SAME INFORMATION THAT I JUST READ TO YOU IN MANY DIFFERENT WAYS.
UM, BUT WE'RE GONNA JUMP INTO THE PROPOSED FY 27 AND FY 31 CIP ANNUAL REQUEST SUMMARY.
AND THIS IS BY CATEGORY, SO IT'LL BE DEPICTED BY CIP CATEGORY.
ON THE LEFT YOU'LL SEE BAWA DRAINAGE FACILITIES, PARKS, TRANSPORTATION, WASTEWATER COLLECTION, WASTEWATER TREATMENT, AND THEN WATER DISTRIBUTION.
[00:25:01]
FIVE YEAR CIP REQUEST IS $382,262,219.I'LL LET Y'ALL LOOK AT THIS SLIDE FOR A LITTLE BIT.
SO THAT'S JUST, THIS IS JUST THE TOTAL SUMMARY AND IT'S SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
SO FY 28 OR 2028, YOU'LL SEE THAT 11 MILLION THAT SHE WAS MENTIONING.
WE HAD PROGRAMMED THAT INTO OUR CIP, UM, AS A PRECAUTION.
UH, IF WE DID NOT GET THE GRANT, UH, FOR FIRE STATION FOUR, AND SO IT WOULD STILL BE FUNDED WITH IT WITHIN THIS REQUEST.
THAT'S WHY THEY CALL THIS A PLAN.
SO AGAIN, HERE'S OUR FIVE YEAR FUNDING SUMMARY.
AND THIS IS GONNA BE BY FUNDING SOURCE, NOT CATEGORY.
SO YOU'LL SEE CASH, UH, CERTIFICATE OF OBLIGATIONS, GENERAL OBLIGATION GRANTS, AND THEN UNFUNDED, AND THEN THE SPECIAL FUND FOR PARKS, FOR EXAMPLE.
AND THIS DEPICTS THE 382 MILLION THAT WE MENTIONED IN MANY DIFFERENT SOURCES.
SO THIS FUNDING SUMMARY IS BY CATEGORY.
UM, AND SO IT COMBINES THE LAST TWO CHARTS INTO ONE.
SO WE HAVE OUR PROJECT CATEGORIES AND THEN THE FUNDING SOURCES THAT WILL BE, UM, ALLOCATED TO THOSE.
SO WE HAVE OUR BAWA THAT'S SEPARATED BY CASH AND CERTIFICATE OF OBLIGATIONS, AND THEN THE REMAINING UNFUNDED, UM, WHICH IS JUST, WE HAVEN'T IDENTIFIED THE FUNDING THIS YET.
UM, AND THEN DRAINAGE AS WELL AND, AND ALL THE OTHER CATEGORIES QUESTIONS HERE.
AND SO NOW WE'RE GONNA GO THROUGH EACH OF THE CIPS.
UH, SO THIS IS THE PROPOSED BAWA, CIP AND IT'LL LIST THE PROJECTS THAT WE HAVE IN MIND.
AND THERE, UM, THIS WILL NOT SHOW YOU THE ALLOCATIONS THAT WE JUST TALKED ABOUT BECAUSE THIS STARTS AT FY 2027.
THIS STARTS AT FY 2027 AND GOES ON TO FY 2031.
AND THE ALLOCATIONS WE'RE HOPING TO BE DONE, UM, 26 FOR BOTH, RIGHT? YEAH.
AND SO, UM, YOU'LL SEE ALL THE PROJECTS LISTED ON THE LEFT.
SO WE HAVE OUR GENERATOR THREE RAW WATER REHAB, THE BACKWASH AND DECANT PUMP REPLACEMENT.
UM, AND YOU'LL SEE THAT'S THE RAW WATER PUMP STATION REHABILITATION.
AND THE BACKWASH DECANT DOES NOT HAVE ANYTHING LISTED ON THERE.
THAT WAS PART OF OUR ATTEMPT AT PROVIDING SOME INFORMATION TO OUR CIP COMMITTEE OF THAT.
THESE ARE PROJECTS THAT ARE ONGOING.
AND SO RAW WATER IS AN ONGOING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT AND BACKWASH.
AND DECANT IS AN ONGOING DESIGN PROJECT ABOUT TO GO INTO CONSTRUCTION.
UH, BAWA SURFACE, AS YOU KNOW, IS UH, PROCEEDED INTO THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE AND THEN THE ADMIN BUILDING IS ONGOING AS WELL.
AND SO YOU'LL SEE THOSE THAT DON'T HAVE ANY NUMBERS TIED TO 'EM.
UM, AS WE'RE NOT REQUESTING YOU MONEY FROM FY 27 TO FY 31.
THE ONLY ONE THAT'S ON THERE FROM THE REALLOCATION THAT YOU'LL SEE IS PROBABLY GONNA BE THE ALTERNATE WATER SOURCES.
BUT THOSE FUNDS WILL BE, UM, ESSENTIALLY EXECUTED IN FY 26, UM, NOT FY 27.
JUMPING DOWN TO OUR PROPOSED DRAINAGE, CIP, WE HAVE A PROGRAMMED IN, OR AT LEAST WRITTEN INTO OUR PLAN, THE 7.4 MILLION THAT WE'RE GOING TO NEED FOR DANINA.
UM, AND WE'RE HOPING TO FIGURE OUT WHETHER OR NOT WE CAN DEFER SOME OF THE ALLOCATIONS OR THE, THE, YOU CAN SEE IT ON THE POTENTIAL NEW DRAINAGE TO BE IDENTIFIED ROSE USE OF CO FUND REALLOCATION.
WE'RE HOPING TO IDENTIFY SOME OF THOSE FUNDS AND, AND HOPEFULLY GET THAT IN FRONT OF Y'ALL AS WELL.
AND MAYBE THE REQUEST WON'T BE FOR 7.4 MILLION.
IT MIGHT BE REDUCED THE PROPOSED FACILITY CIP.
YOU'LL SEE THAT THERE'S NO REQUEST FOR FY 2027.
UM, BUT OUR FIRST REQUEST IS FOR THE FIRE STATION, WHICH IS IN, UH, FFY 2028.
SO YOU'LL SEE ON HERE A COUPLE DIFFERENT PROJECTS.
THE ONES IN RED ARE THE PROJECTS THAT RECEIVE GEO BOND FUNDS.
UM, AND THEN THE OTHER ONES ARE PROJECTS THAT ARE ANNUAL CONTRACTS OR ANNUAL PROGRAMS. SO NORTH ALEXANDER AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL RELOCATION.
YOU'LL NOTICE THAT THAT NUMBER IS ACTUALLY DIFFERENT FROM THE GO BOND.
THAT'S BECAUSE SOME OF IT IS THAT A CORRECT? NO, IT'S NOT DIFFERENT.
IT'S JUST UM, THIS WAS ONE WHERE WE PROGRAMMED IT TO VIEW IN 27, EVEN THOUGH THE FUNDS ARE ISSUED IN 26, JUST 'CAUSE THATS WHEN THE WORK'S GONNA START.
[00:30:01]
RENEWAL OF ASPHALT STREETS.AND THAT ONE WAS FOR 20 MILLION.
AND THAT WOULD'VE BEEN 4 MILLION PER YEAR, BUT IT'S JUST, IT'S NOT IN HERE BECAUSE OF THE TIMING.
SO WE HAVE THE ALLEN BURKE INTERIOR STREETS HERE, BUT WE ALREADY HAVE IT FUNDED ELSEWHERE.
IT'S PART OF, THAT'S PART OF THE REALLOCATION.
SO IF, IF THE REALLOCATION, ANY PROJECT WITH A STAR ON HERE, YOU'RE NOT GONNA SEE THE NUMBER.
BUT IF YOU GO BACK TO THIS PAGE, THAT'S WHERE YOU'LL SEE THOSE PROJECTS AND YOU CAN SEE THE, HOW WE'RE PLANNING TO FUND IT.
I DON'T HAVE THE IMPACT ON HERE BECAUSE IT WOULD'VE ADDED TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF THE CIP AND THAT'S DEFEATS THE PURPOSE OF REALLOCATING FUNDS.
WE DON'T WANNA MAKE THE CIP LOOK LIKE IT'S GONNA COST MORE MONEY WHEN RIGHT.
SO THE GOAL OF, OF THE REALLOCATION PROCESS IS SO WE DON'T PURSUE NEW DEBT FOR THE ONES THAT WE HAVE AND TO SPEND THE MONEY WE HAVE.
AND THEN THIS IS THE PROPOSED WASTEWATER COLLECTION.
AND YOU'LL SEE ON HERE THE ONES HIGHLIGHTED IN RED.
THOSE ARE PART OF THE EARLY ACTION PLAN.
UM, AND SO THE STEINMAN AND WEST TEXAS AND THE REPLACEMENT OF GARTH ROAD AND NORTH GARTH AND NORTHWOOD, THOSE SPECIFICALLY ARE BEING FUNDED VIA DESIGN THROUGH THE REALLOCATION.
UH, AND SO THESE ARE THE CONSTRUCTION FUNDS THAT ARE GONNA BE NEEDED FOR THOSE.
I HAVE TO SAY THAT EVOLUTION OF THE CIP AND JUST THE SPREADSHEETS IN GENERAL ARE SO MUCH BETTER THAN FOUR YEARS AGO.
NO, I MEAN IT'S EVEN WHAT YOU WERE SAYING WITH INTENTIONALLY MAKING SURE THAT YOU DON'T GIVE THE PERCEPTION THAT THERE'S MORE MONEY BEING SPENT ON CIP AND ALL THAT.
LIKE WITH THE ALLEN BROOK, I JUST, SO, SO MUCH EASIER TO READ.
WELL, I THINK IT, IT GOES BACK TO YOUR ORIGINAL COMMENTS WHEN YOU FIRST STARTED ABOUT THE DIFFERENT BUCKETS OF MONEY.
ARE THEY, YOU CAN SEE THE BUCKETS NOW.
YOU CAN ACTUALLY, NO, I MEAN I JUST, I REALLY WANT TO TELL Y'ALL THANK YOU.
'CAUSE IT'S, THAT'S WHY THERE HASN'T BEEN THAT MANY QUESTIONS 'CAUSE IT'S VERY CLEAR WHAT WHAT'S ON THERE.
DID YOU SEND HER THE OTHER DOCUMENT THAT WE DISCUSSED AT THE LAST MEETING WITH THE SUMMARY THAT WE CAN USE FOR OUR CONSTITUENTS AND STUFF? OH, I'LL, I'LL EMAIL IT TO YOU.
SHE WAS TRYING TO LEAVE ME OUT
UM, BUT THAT'S BECAUSE WE'RE, WE'RE GIVING ESTIMATES ON THOSE.
REALLY TRANSPARENT ABOUT THAT.
SO PROPOSED WASTEWATER TREATMENT, CIP.
UM, AND SO AGAIN, SIMILAR TO THE LAST SHEET, THE PROPOSED PROJECTS THAT ARE IN RED ARE PART OF THE EARLY ACTION PLAN.
UM, AND SO YOU'LL SEE SOME REPEATS FROM THE LAST SLIDE OR THE LAST COUPLE OF SLIDES.
CENTRAL DISTRICT, THIS IS THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION FUNDS FOR THE FIRST FOUR UP THERE.
UM, AND THEN EACH ONE OF THOSE, UM, DIFFERING IN, IN SEGMENTS.
FOR EXAMPLE, THE NORTHEAST, UH, DISTRICT WESTWATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS, THAT'S THE CONSTRUCTION FUNDS.
THE NORTHEAST DISTRICT WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT WAS FUNDED BY A CO, UM, THIS PAST COUNCIL.
SO SOME OF THESE ARE CONSTRUCTION FUNDS, SOME OF THEM ARE DESIGNED, IF YOU CAN'T SEE A ADDITIONAL YEAR OF FUNDING, IT'S A GOOD RULE OF THUMB TO ASSUME THAT THE DESIGN WAS ALREADY FUNDED.
UM, SO YOU'LL SEE DOWN THERE ON THE FIRST RED ONE AFTER THE WEST DISTRICT ELECTRICAL, UM, CENTRAL DISTRICT WASTEWATER TREATMENT, WASTEWATER TREATMENT IMPROVEMENT PACKAGE.
ONE, YOU'LL SEE 554,000 BEING REQUESTED, FY 27 AND THEN 3.9 MILLION BEING REQUESTED FY 28, UM, 554,000 IS FOR THE DESIGN PORTION.
AND THEN THE 3.9 MILLION IS GONNA BE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION.
IT'S JUST AMAZING HOW MUCH THE WATER COSTS.
AND THE CITY OF HOUSTON CONTINUING TO RAISE THEIR RENT, THEIR RENT, THE RENT, WHAT IT FEELS LIKE.
SO THIS ONE WILL ALSO LIST SOME PROB PROGRAMS DOWN THERE.
FOR EXAMPLE, THE WATER METER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM THAT WE TALKED ABOUT EARLIER.
UM, IT DOESN'T HAVE ANY REQUESTS ON FY 27 TO FY 31, BUT THE OTHER PROJECTS DO.
UM, BUT THERE ARE SEVERAL PROJECTS THAT ARE
[00:35:01]
ANNUAL PROJECTS AND THEN THERE'S WATERLINE AREA IMPROVEMENTS AND REPLACEMENTS.SO THE PROPOSED PARK, CIP, SO THE PROPOSED PARK, CIP HAS SEVERAL, UM, PARKS PROJECTS LISTED ON HERE.
AND AGAIN, YOU'LL SEE SOME ROUNDED NUMBERS BECAUSE THESE ARE, ARE OUR BEST GUEST AT REQUEST REQUESTED.
UM, BUT THEY'LL HAVE SEVERAL PROJECTS ON THERE.
FOR EXAMPLE, WAYNE GRAY PROGRAMMED IN AN FY 29, UM, THE PARKS OPERATION SERVICE CENTER, THE DISC GOLF COURSE, UM, AND TEJAS PARK.
AND SOME OF THEM WERE PUSHED OUT TO FY 31 BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT ENTIRELY SURE OF WHETHER OR NOT WE'RE GOING TO GET THAT FUNDING.
BUT IT'S NOT A HIGH, HIGH PRIORITY FOR THAT ONE.
UH, IN COMPARISON TO THE OTHER PROJECTS THAT THEY'VE REQUESTED, WHICH DISC GOLF COURSE ARE WE TALKING ABOUT ON THIS ONE BY ROSELAND PARK? NOT THE ONLY ONE THERE.
WELL, IT WAS A NEW ONE THAT THEY WERE PROPOSING.
OR IS IT THE ONE OVER HERE BY CENTRAL HEIGHTS? I'M GONNA ASSUME THAT IT'S THE ONE THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO BUILD HERE.
IT WAS GONNA COST WAY TOO MUCH.
SO THEY WERE, I I DON'T WANNA SPEAK OVER THAT, BUT I'VE HEARD THEY'RE STILL TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHERE.
BUT I, I'M ASSUMING, 'CAUSE THAT NUMBER IS SIMILAR TO WHAT I WAS TOLD IS LEFT OVER WHEN WE WERE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT TO DO WITH THE, YOU KNOW, HOW THEY PUT THE, THE SMALLER, UM, DISC GOLF IN FRONT OF EVERGREEN'S NEIGHBORHOOD AND THAT THAT WAS AROUND THE AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT WAS LEFT OVER.
BUT I DON'T HAVE ANY CLUE MYSELF WHERE I JUST DIDN'T THINK IT WAS GONNA BE UNTIL 2031 THAT WE WORK ON IT.
I THINK THIS IS PROBABLY JUST A REFLECTION OF COUNCIL PRIORITY AND YEAH, I I, I WAS INTERESTED TO SEE THAT NATURE CENTERS, SINCE THEY WEREN'T APPROVED ON THE BOND FOR THE BUILDING, NOW THEY'RE JUST GONNA DO A STORAGE BUILDING.
BUT YEAH, THERE ARE SEVERAL PROJECTS ON THERE AND WE CAN GET YOU UP MORE DETAILS AS NEEDED.
UM, THE JENKINS PARK PROJECT IS ON THERE FOR THE 1.5.
UM, HOWEVER, NOW THAT WE'VE BEEN SELECTED FOR THE GRANT, THAT MIGHT BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
ANY QUESTIONS ON ANY OF THE OTHER ONES? I THINK CIP DID A GOOD JOB ON THAT.
I'M SURPRISED WE'RE GETTING PERKS ON CIP.
WELL, YEAH, I MEAN THAT'S THE OVERALL YEAH.
BUT IT WOULD BE GREAT TO HAVE LIKE A DESCRIPTION OF THESE PROJECTS AS WELL.
'CAUSE SOME OF 'EM, I, THEY'RE NEW IN THE ACTUAL CIP POOL.
ONCE THE CIP IS ADOPTED BY COUNCIL, THERE'S A BOOK THAT IS GENERATED AND IT'S POSTED ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE WITH LIKE THE BUDGET AND IT INCLUDES PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS GO FROM ALL OF THEM.
WHERE'S MISSY DAVIDSON PARK? IT'S ON, UH, WARD ROAD ALL THE WAY DOWN.
UM, ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE, IT'S A BIG GRASS.
I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY ACRES IT IS.
SO PAST KROGER ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ROAD AND UM, IT HAS NO, THERE'S BASEBALL STOPS OUT THERE AND PEOPLE PRACTICE, BUT THERE'S ZERO PARKING ZERO.
SO THEY PULL ONTO THE GRASSY AREA.
EVEN ON A DAY LIKE TODAY, IT'S REAL MUDDY.
AND SO I DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT THAT IT WAS DONATED LAND.
IT'S BECAUSE OTHER THAN BEING USED FOR PRACTICE, THERE'S NOTHING ELSE OUT THERE EXCEPT SOME BACKSTOPS.
AND THEN THEY, THERE'S SOME SMALL AREA WITH SEATING THAT'S DEDICATED TO MISSY DAVIS FAMILY OR SOMETHING.
IT, IT'S VERY CEMETERY ESQUE IN MY OPINION.
LIKE THAT'S MY PERCEPTION OF THAT LITTLE AREA, BUT GOT IT.
NOT MUCH GOING ON AT THAT PARK RIGHT BEFORE IL MM-HMM
SO, UM, OUR NEXT STEPS FOR THIS AS CIP COMMITTEE, BECAUSE THIS IS THE SAME PRESENTATION THAT WE GAVE CP COMMITTEE, BUT UH, OUR NEXT STEPS ARE TO DISCUSS POSSIBLE DATES FOR THE FUTURE MEETINGS AND THEN, UH, REVIEW PROPOSED CASH REALLOCATION AND THEN REVIEW DRAFTS, A FEW OTHER THINGS.
BUT THAT'S OUR TARGET FOR THE CIP.
SO WE WANTED TO BRING THIS TO YOU BECAUSE I BELIEVE THAT THE ISSUES EXPRESSED THIS PAST TIME YES.
TO GO INTO MORE IN DEPTH CONVERSATION ABOUT EACH OF THESE PROJECTS.
QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? UM, NO, I, I THINK IT WAS REALLY CLEAR, Y'ALL LET ME ASK WHAT I WANTED AS I WAS GOING ALONG, SO I DON'T, DON'T HAVE ANY MORE.
I APPRECIATE YOU HOSTING THE MEETING TODAY.
AND, UM, AND I'M TRYING TO PLAN AHEAD AS YOU LOOK AT DIFFERENT FINANCE MEETINGS.
[00:40:01]
THE 22ND, UM, I'M HOPING TO MAKE IT TO, TO THE COUNCIL MEETING, BUT DEFINITELY WILL NOT BE HERE EARLY TO, BECAUSE I'M, I'M TRAVELING BACK IN FROM DC SO I WON'T BE ABLE, LIKE I'LL PROBABLY BE IN A RUSH.I THOUGHT I WAS GOING TO BE COMING IN LATE, BUT I COME IN LIKE AT TWO AND SO I DON'T WANNA RUSH TO GET HERE TO A FINANCE COMMITTEE.
ON WHAT DAY? THE JUNE 25TH? I THINK IT IS THE 22ND.
SO ON THE 25TH? WELL, THE WEEK OF THE 22ND.
UM, SO I THINK IT'S LIKE THE 25TH.
WELL, WE, WE WEREN'T GONNA PROPOSE ONE UNLESS YOU REQUESTED ONE BECAUSE WE HAVE THAT, UH, BUDGET WORKSHOP ON THE 26TH ALL DAY AFTER.
AND I LET, UH, THOMAS, UNFORTUNATELY I WON'T BE HERE ON THAT DATE.
SO I'M LEAVING OUTTA THE STATE THAT MORNING.
I KNOW, I, I WAS SUR SURPRISED AND I PROBABLY OKAYED THIS AT SOME POINT WHEN THEY ASKED, UM, BUT I WAS SURPRISED THAT IT WAS ON A FRIDAY.
SO, WHICH NORMALLY WOULDN'T BE A PROBLEM, BUT I'M, I'M, I THINK, AREN'T THOSE THE DATES THAT THEY WERE CANVASSING FOR US AT NIGHT? MIGHT HAVE, BUT THAT WAS MONTHS AGO.
AND I, AND I, BUT THEY GAVE US NEW DATES AT THAT LAST MEETING BECAUSE THEY'RE LIKE, THEY DIDN'T GET A CONSENSUS.
WHAT ON THE CALENDAR? FOR ME, IT JUST SAYS TPD.
AND SO I, I JUST WENT AHEAD WHEN I WAS GOING THROUGH THE CALENDAR FOR THE SUMMER, NOW THAT I HAVE MORE EXACT DATES OF THINGS GOING ON, AND IT STILL SAYS TPD, SO ITPD, EXCUSE ME.
UM, SO I WENT AHEAD AND, AND LIKE I SAID, I EMAILED, UM, JASON AND THOMAS AND LET 'EM KNOW.
SO I, I DON'T KNOW IF THEY'RE GONNA KEEP THAT DATE, IF THAT DATE WORKED FOR EVERYONE ELSE.
I WOULDN'T MIND ON OH, BUT YOU WON'T BE BACK UNTIL LATER THE DAY ON COUNCIL DAY? UM, YES.
SEE, I WAS GONNA PROPOSE EARLIER THAT DAY.
AND YOU'RE GONE THAT WHOLE WEEK.
I WONDER JUST IN, IN, IN THE WORLD OF THE STAFF, WOULD IT, I KNOW THIS NO OTHER VARIABLES, BUT LIKE THE, THE NEXT WEEK, THE JUNE THE 15TH THROUGH THE 19TH, THERE'S NOTHING ON OUR YOU MEAN FOR THE WORKSHOP? YEAH.
TO MOVE IT FROM THAT FRIDAY TO THAT NEXT WEEK? SOMETIMES.
I DON'T KNOW IF, IS IT BECAUSE THEY'RE TRAVELING IS TCMA OR SOMETHING? OH, IT MIGHT BE.
YEAH, BECAUSE I, I'M NOTICING LIKE COUNCIL CALENDAR'S JUST COMPLETELY EMPTY FOR US THOUGH, SO THAT MIGHT BE IT.
SO, WELL, IF THANK YOU, THAT WAS A GREAT PRESENTATION.
AND SO WITH THAT, UM, WE ARE ADJOURNING AT 4 22.